The process used for selecting a steady-state process simulator under conditions of high uncertainty and limited time is described. ![]() The final software decisions provide flexibility: they involve annual rather than multi-year licensing, and they include periodic = , It was concluded from ''road tests'' that ASPEN Plus appears to satisfy the project's technical requirements the best and is worth acquiring. The candidate list was narrowed to three final contenders: ASPEN Plus 10.2, PRO/II 5.11, and CHEMCAD 5.1.0. Twelve simulators were investigated with varying degrees of scrutiny. And second, determine if the best is good enough to justify the cost. First, determine the steady-state simulation software that best, albeit not completely, satisfies the requirements envelope. The aim of the selection process was two-fold. Multiple waste forms, treatment ambiguity, and the uniqueness of both the waste chemistries and alternative treatment technologies result in a large set of potential technical requirements that no commercial simulator can totally satisfy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |